To fork or not to fork - that is the question

ravenlife · Regular Joined: May 07, 2006 Posts: 62

did a right post and then relised

wow this is old

did anything ever come of this

montego · Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:08 am

It is still being discussed. The focus right now is getting RavenNuke out, stable, with compliance and performance improvements and with a few asked for bundled modules and then we'll see if PHP-Portal comes to fruition.

ravenlife · Regular Joined: May 07, 2006 Posts: 62

ahh thats a real shame

will keep watch on this.

hall · New Member Joined: Aug 08, 2006 Posts: 14

I would do everything in css. Thats what I am realy missing in nuke ! css give you so much possibilities when you are talking about webdesign. You change one color code and on every page of your entire site it has changed.

Raven · Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:03 pm

hall wrote:

I would do everything in css. Thats what I am realy missing in nuke ! css give you so much possibilities when you are talking about webdesign. You change one color code and on every page of your entire site it has changed.

We totally agree. Should we go this route it will be a grounds up project - the correct way.

Canadaka · New Member Joined: Feb 10, 2006 Posts: 23

I don't care much for another "phpnuke package" with a bunch of existing mods and modules intigrated. Anyone can do this and many have.

I think creating a fork "core" based on security and maybe even more important speed/performance, is a great idea. But don't go adding a bunch of bloat. People can add stuff as they see it fit.

heh would be nice to use phpbb3 too Wink

I don't think the direction php-nuke is taking with a Proprietary forum is a good one, you loose the VAST community of phpbb mods and such which filters over to nuke.

Raven · Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:12 am

I've been testing phpbb 3 as I have time and it is pretty awesome Smile

And as for the rest of your post, that is my original premise in this thread Wink