Is Nuke dying out?

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:46 pm

Whole Package 5 euros. I think everybody can afford that.
The rest could be included because the user is already a subscriber and interested on fixing blocks, modules, addon, theme etc..

New Member Joined: Aug 30, 2006 Posts: 13

no where near enough for the work that goes on behind the scenes

rest is addons is how i see it so small fees would be a good idea i think.

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:06 am

sexycoder wrote:

Whole Package 5 euros. I think everybody can afford that.
The rest could be included because the user is already a subscriber and interested on fixing blocks, modules, addon, theme etc..

I disagree with your idea. Open Source should be free. I have tested a lot of CMS currently and if I had to pay first before I can try it out I wouldn´t use it because some just don´t work with my hosting and I had to delete them after install. I don ´t hestitate to use the donation button if I find it and feel there is something I really should support and show my tribute.
All RavenNuke users are free to use the Donation button but it looks like the most can´t find it or have an other problem . Rolling Eyes

Btw: For 4 Euro you can buy a cigarette pack + 1 Euro left for a cup of coffee.

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:13 am

.. unless your in Poland, Slovakia or the Czech Republic in which case you can buy 2 packs plus a coffee Smile

registered · Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:04 am

Charging for Open Source is a bad idea. You limit the amount of users and collaborators willing to try the software and you also close the software off to improvements from other coders. If the cost of development over take the donations coming in, I would suggest stressing the importance of open source donations and how the money spent to support worth while projects helps more than yourself. That donation helps everyone who uses open source projects. Many developers support multiple projects through support and donations themselves. If you use an open source cms on a site that makes a profit, you should donate to the developers. If you do it as a hobby, consider donating if you have the extra money. All users should help spread the word by leaving copyrights in the footer and giving positive ratings at places like Hot Scripts or other websites where the software is advertised. Just my 3 cents (cost of living increase due to inflation, used to be 2 cents).

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:09 pm

@nuke well written !
@Guardian it´s a pity I don´t live there . So its only 1 pack. Smile

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:07 pm

What's with the message about 9.0 comming soon?
So it's not dead but just in a coma?
How would it awake after 3 years?

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:27 pm

I think Nuke 9.0 falls in the same category with Big Foot, Leprechauns and Hogzilla....

Worker Joined: Mar 30, 2009 Posts: 132

and you can bet money 9.0 wont be worth a crap due to bugs and severe security issues like 8.1,8.0 ect ect.

registered · Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:23 am

The message has been there for a long while. Chris Karakas and Claudio Erba are the owners

Site Admin/Owner Joined: Aug 27, 2002 Posts: 17088

eldorado wrote:

Chris Karakas and Claudio Erba are the owners

Of phpnuke.org?

registered · Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:46 am

Raven wrote:

eldorado wrote:

Chris Karakas and Claudio Erba are the owners

Of phpnuke.org?

2nd that...

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:55 am

i think FB never sold it.
When there was told it was sold i checked whois and was still on FB's name.
( it could be the info wasnt updated yet)
Then a week or 2 after i checked it was registered to a company i forgot the name of it.
And if you check now , the domain is registered as a private domain.
Why's that?

I have my doubts

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:47 am

floppydrivez wrote:

Raven wrote:

eldorado wrote:

Chris Karakas and Claudio Erba are the owners

Of phpnuke.org?

2nd that...

rumors

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:51 am

All I know is downloads.phpnuke.org is the new main traffic source.

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:59 am

floppydrivez wrote:

All I know is downloads.phpnuke.org is the new main traffic source.

downloads.phpnuke.org wrote:

the future of the web...

It shows outdated software Razz

Is that our future... being outdated Shocked

registered · Site Admin Joined: Jun 04, 2004 Posts: 6437

floppydrivez, what do you mean by "new main traffic source"?

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:12 pm

means everyone downloading from this site.

Involved Joined: Sep 15, 2008 Posts: 352

eldorado,

Where did you here this?

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:33 pm

"new main traffic source"?

not sure how new got in those quotes, I smell conspiracy.. Blonde Moment

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:54 pm

I'll just contact Chris and ask him Wink

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:44 pm

alien73 wrote:

eldorado,

Where did you here this?

I only recall it being said by one of my friends , with which we were building a site for a club. I should have checked that , but I was really busy at the time.

Quote:

I'll just contact Chris and ask him Wink

I love investigating Razz

Let's write down a list of the "possible owners" :

list of suspect wrote:

Bob Marion
Raven
Montego
Cyril
Bill Gates
Chris Karakas
Claudio Erba
Saddam
Bin Laden
China
Ped and Floppy
astalavistabd (or whatever his name is)

Just a stupid question , but do they have bots working phpnuke.org? Who is publishing news?

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:29 pm

Well you can eliminate Ped and Floppy from that list cause well of the obvious....

registered · Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:55 pm

and mine...

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:23 pm

Ok....I'll come clean. I bought it. It's mine. I guess I should have told ya'll....

Version 10 is really RN2.1.....

LOL!

Dawg