NukeSentinel Stopped/Not Tracking IP's

Worker Joined: Aug 22, 2006 Posts: 192

I am using Raven's RavenNuke(tm) v2.02.02 Distro for my website.

I have the NukeSentinel IP tracker page set to display 50 IP's per page.

The last tracked IP date was recorded as 2006-12-31 and since then, although I know there have been visitors to my website, further IP's appear not to be tracked.

I do note that I now have as many as 60 pages of IP records and wonder if this may be a limitation, (i.e. have I used up the 'space' allowed/allocated for this and do I now need to delete some of the old/recorded IP's in the list in order to continue seeing any new ones that visit my website?).

Also, on a separate matter, (before the above problem was noticed), I have observed the following problem when using NukeSentinel with Raven's RavenNuke(tm) v2.02.02 Distro for my website and the problem was not apparent when I was running a website with the 'standard' PHP-Nuke version 7.6 package...

I have set the IP's to be recorded and listed in 'Date/Descending' order, which I have always assumed also means chronological order for IPs recorded on the same date.

However, often an IP apparently recorded as visiting my website at a time or date subsequent to the last date or time recorded, is itself recorded/displayed in a position indicating it had actually visited prior to the last recorded IP......So I am wondering why this is?

As an example I have included some of my recorded ip data below and as you will see, for some strange reason, an IP recorded as visiting on December 31 2006, has been places/recorded between the last IP recorded on December 29 2006 and the first IP recorded on December 30 2006. .....So again I am wondering why this is?

74.6.66.43 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 13:45:55 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.71.83 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 11:27:57 2 Print View Block Delete
83.151.156.148 (dk) Denmark 2006-12-31 @ 09:34:07 2 Print View Block Delete
74.6.67.154 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 09:16:44 2 Print View Block Delete
74.6.69.223 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 04:40:50 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.68.166 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 03:50:27 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.73.217 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 02:40:39 2 Print View Block Delete
74.6.67.214 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 01:50:14 2 Print View Block Delete
74.6.72.182 (00) Unknown 2006-12-30 @ 21:22:48 1 Print View Block Delete
219.181.212.116 (jp) Japan 2006-12-30 @ 20:27:39 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.72.72 (00) Unknown 2006-12-30 @ 20:14:57 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.71.252 (00) Unknown 2006-12-30 @ 19:49:23 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.69.44 (00) Unknown 2006-12-30 @ 18:26:06 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.69.124 (00) Unknown 2006-12-30 @ 12:50:42 2 Print View Block Delete
74.6.69.108 (00) Unknown 2006-12-30 @ 12:50:38 1 Print View Block Delete
74.6.68.157 (00) Unknown 2006-12-30 @ 12:47:42 1 Print View Block Delete
82.140.85.130 (ru) Russia 2006-12-30 @ 08:04:20 2 Print View Block Delete
74.6.67.159 (00) Unknown 2006-12-31 @ 13:05:38 26 Print View Block Delete
74.6.68.82 (00) Unknown 2006-12-29 @ 23:29:26 1 Print View Block Delete
60.236.197.10 (jp) Japan 2006-12-29 @ 22:24:57 2 Print View Block Delete

Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:41 am

Just for my own curiousity, why do you keep 60 pages of tracked iP's?

Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:51 am

FireATST,

I should have placed a huge bet that the first response to me would be akin to yours!!!.... killing me

There IS no specific reason, however my website has been working OK, (not too slow etc) and I did not think keeping so many records was an issue.

Moreover not knowing what others do or what is 'correct', I thoguht it 'safer' to keep them...I mean if you keep them , you can always delete them......but if you always delet them forthwith, you cannot return to them at a later time, for whatever reason.

I hope someone else can now respond and help with a more detailed and specific reply.

Thank you for now FireATST.

Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:56 am

Sorry, didn't mean to offend you. As I posted it was just my own curiousity.

Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:03 am

No offence taken FireATST... Groovy

registered · Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:24 pm

emmaphp, unless you are comparing the exact same NukeSentinel versions, you cannot lay claim to RavenNuke 2.02.02 being any different, because it really isn't.

Which option exactly are you seeing this discrepancy? Are you using "Display Tracked IPs", "Display Tracked Users" or "Display Tracked User Agents"? I would be willing to bet its just how the records are being "grouped" together because I see that he is using the UNIX timestamp to mark each record, so those would be in the right sequence if there was no grouping of "like" records.