Related
Re: Sentinel™ 2.0.0 (Score: 1) |  | Is there a forum for Sentinal 2.0 feedback ? In the absence of my finding one, I'll post here. The only part of the Admin I felt was missing was the ability to have a "default" config setting. A place where I could say "Block, Email, PCKill" etc etc and that would default for all types of exploits. Then I would only have to individually change the setting for any exploit detection & prevention I wanted handled differently from my default setting. Other then that, it looks great. Especially the Admin protection, something I am sure I will find most valuable. |
| Re: Sentinel™ 2.0.0 (Score: 1) by Raven on Monday, July 19, 2004 @ 09:26:56 CDT (User Info | Send a Message) | |
Sentinel (General) and Sentinel Enhancements [ravenphpscripts.com] |
| Re: Sentinel™ 2.0.0 (Score: 1) by Raven on Monday, July 19, 2004 @ 10:49:01 CDT (User Info | Send a Message) | |
Even if you don't use Sentinel (but then again, why wouldn't you?) you have the Admin Protection [ravenphpscripts.com] available. |
| Re: Sentinel™ 2.0.0 (Score: 1) by baloo (me@me.org) on Monday, July 19, 2004 @ 19:56:34 CDT (User Info | Send a Message) | |
Exactly, why wouldn't I use Sentinel ? It would be like, um, yeah... all sorts of unsafe things. |
| Re: Sentinel™ 2.0.0 (Score: 1) by BobMarion (webmaster@nukescripts.net) on Monday, July 19, 2004 @ 10:54:08 CDT (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.nukescripts.net | |
An overall default setting maybe added later on but for now it's best to require the webmaster to set each blocker type. |
![[Valid RSS]](https://www.ravenphpscripts.com/images/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=small}
